Twitter Helps Reverse A Gag Order

by kegill on 19 October 2009

in Examples

In Bri­tain, the edi­tor of The Guar­dian explains how Twit­ter hel­ped reverse a “super injunc­tion” that pre­ven­ted news media from repor­ting on the “exis­tence of court pro­cee­dings and court orders” rela­ted to a mas­sive lawsuit.

It took one tweet on Mon­day eve­ning as I left the office to light the vir­tual touch­pa­per. At five past nine I tap­ped: “Now Guar­dian pre­ven­ted from repor­ting par­lia­ment for unre­por­ta­ble rea­sons. Did John Wil­kes live in vain?” Twitter’s detrac­tors are used to snee­ring that nothing of value can be said in 140 cha­rac­ters. My 104 cha­rac­ters did just fine.

By the time I got home, after stop­ping off for a meal with friends, the Twit­tersphere had gone into melt­down. Twit­te­rers had sleuthed down Farrelly’s ques­tion, published the rele­vant links and were now seriously on the case. By mid­day on Tues­day “Tra­fi­gura” was one of the most searched terms in Europe, hel­ped along by re-tweets by Stephen Fry and his 830,000-odd followers.

More details (and backs­tory) from the New York Times.

Previous post: TechFlash on UWTwitterBook and “Firsts”

Next post: Real-Time Search Shoot-Out